1. [short title of solved problem and solution]¶
- Status: [accepted | superseeded by ADR-0005 | deprecated | …]
- Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision]
- Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated]
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL]
1.1. Context and Problem Statement¶
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
1.2. Decision Drivers ¶
- [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
- [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
- …
1.3. Considered Options¶
- [option 1]
- [option 2]
- [option 3]
- …
1.4. Decision Outcome¶
Chosen option: “[option 1]”, because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
1.4.1. Positive Consequences ¶
- [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
- …
1.4.2. Negative consequences ¶
- [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
- …
1.5. Pros and Cons of the Options ¶
1.5.1. [option 1]¶
[example | description | pointer to more information | …]
- Good, because [argument a]
- Good, because [argument b]
- Bad, because [argument c]
- …
1.5.2. [option 2]¶
[example | description | pointer to more information | …]
- Good, because [argument a]
- Good, because [argument b]
- Bad, because [argument c]
- …
1.5.3. [option 3]¶
[example | description | pointer to more information | …]
- Good, because [argument a]
- Good, because [argument b]
- Bad, because [argument c]
- …
1.6. Links ¶
- [Link type] [Link to ADR]
- …